what hi-tech has done is to bloat up the lite version, and then optimize against that in the pro version to give the illusion of drastic space savings: the claimed 20 - 25% savings for example.
however, when you compare the code generated using the pro compilers vs. code generated using older non-OCG compilers (anything up to 9.60 std I think), you will find that the ocg compilers offer little incremental savings.
what hi-tech has done is to bloat up the lite version, and then optimize against that in the pro version to give the illusion of drastic space savings: the claimed 20 - 25% savings for example.
however, when you compare the code generated using the pro compilers vs. code generated using older non-OCG compilers (anything up to 9.60 std I think), you will find that the ocg compilers offer little incremental savings.
so I am still using my 9.60std.
一周热门 更多>