DSP28335用XDS100v2连接不上,求问题所在?

2019-07-15 19:23发布

刚接触DSP28335,CCS5.3编程环境,XDS100v2下载器,同样的程序和配置连接下载一个老板没有问题,现在项目需要用了一个新板,但是连接测试错误,错误信息如下,求高手指教。
[Start]

Execute the command:

%ccs_base%/common/uscif/dbgjtag -f %boarddatafile% -rv -o -F inform,logfile=yes -S pathlength -S integrity

[Result]


-----[Print the board config pathname(s)]------------------------------------

C:UsersADMINI~1AppDataLocal.ti4084209646
    0BrdDat estBoard.dat

-----[Print the reset-command software log-file]-----------------------------

This utility has selected a 100- or 510-class product.
This utility will load the adapter 'jioserdesusb.dll'.
The library build date was 'Oct  3 2012'.
The library build time was '21:58:41'.
The library package version is '5.0.872.0'.
The library component version is '35.34.40.0'.
The controller does not use a programmable FPGA.
The controller has a version number of '4' (0x00000004).
The controller has an insertion length of '0' (0x00000000).
This utility will attempt to reset the controller.
This utility has successfully reset the controller.

-----[Print the reset-command hardware log-file]-----------------------------

The scan-path will be reset by toggling the JTAG TRST signal.
The controller is the FTDI FT2232 with USB interface.
The link from controller to target is direct (without cable).
The software is configured for FTDI FT2232 features.
The controller cannot monitor the value on the EMU[0] pin.
The controller cannot monitor the value on the EMU[1] pin.
The controller cannot control the timing on output pins.
The controller cannot control the timing on input pins.
The scan-path link-delay has been set to exactly '0' (0x0000).

-----[The log-file for the JTAG TCLK output generated from the PLL]----------

There is no hardware for programming the JTAG TCLK frequency.

-----[Measure the source and frequency of the final JTAG TCLKR input]--------

There is no hardware for measuring the JTAG TCLK frequency.

-----[Perform the standard path-length test on the JTAG IR and DR]-----------

This path-length test uses blocks of 512 32-bit words.

The test for the JTAG IR instruction path-length failed.
The many-ones then many-zeros tested length was 6 bits.
The many-zeros then many-ones tested length was -16352 bits.

The test for the JTAG DR bypass path-length failed.
The many-ones then many-zeros tested length was 8 bits.
The many-zeros then many-ones tested length was -16352 bits.

-----[Perform the Integrity scan-test on the JTAG IR]------------------------

This test will use blocks of 512 32-bit words.
This test will be applied just once.

Do a test using 0xFFFFFFFF.
Scan tests: 1, skipped: 0, failed: 0
Do a test using 0x00000000.
Test 2 Word 0: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0x000000FF.
Scan tests: 2, skipped: 0, failed: 1
Do a test using 0xFE03E0E2.
Test 3 Word 0: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FE7FF.
Test 3 Word 1: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FC7FF.
Test 3 Word 2: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FE7FF.
Test 3 Word 3: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FE7EF.
Test 3 Word 4: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FC7FF.
Test 3 Word 5: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FC3FF.
Test 3 Word 6: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC0FE7FF.
The details of the first 8 errors have been provided.
The utility will now report only the count of failed tests.
Scan tests: 3, skipped: 0, failed: 2
Do a test using 0x01FC1F1D.
Scan tests: 4, skipped: 0, failed: 3
Do a test using 0x5533CCAA.
Scan tests: 5, skipped: 0, failed: 4
Do a test using 0xAACC3355.
Scan tests: 6, skipped: 0, failed: 5
Some of the values were corrupted - 66.7 percent.

The JTAG IR Integrity scan-test has failed.

-----[Perform the Integrity scan-test on the JTAG DR]------------------------

This test will use blocks of 512 32-bit words.
This test will be applied just once.

Do a test using 0xFFFFFFFF.
Scan tests: 1, skipped: 0, failed: 0
Do a test using 0x00000000.
Test 2 Word 0: scanned out 0x00000000 and scanned in 0x0000007F.
Scan tests: 2, skipped: 0, failed: 1
Do a test using 0xFE03E0E2.
Test 3 Word 0: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FE7FF.
Test 3 Word 1: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC3FE7FF.
Test 3 Word 2: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC0FE7FF.
Test 3 Word 3: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC3FE7FF.
Test 3 Word 4: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FC7FF.
Test 3 Word 5: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFE1FE7FF.
Test 3 Word 6: scanned out 0xFE03E0E2 and scanned in 0xFC1FE7FF.
The details of the first 8 errors have been provided.
The utility will now report only the count of failed tests.
Scan tests: 3, skipped: 0, failed: 2
Do a test using 0x01FC1F1D.
Scan tests: 4, skipped: 0, failed: 3
Do a test using 0x5533CCAA.
Scan tests: 5, skipped: 0, failed: 4
Do a test using 0xAACC3355.
Scan tests: 6, skipped: 0, failed: 5
Some of the values were corrupted - 66.7 percent.

The JTAG DR Integrity scan-test has failed.

[End]

友情提示: 此问题已得到解决,问题已经关闭,关闭后问题禁止继续编辑,回答。